[Православная беседа] [Ответы и комментарии] [Написать ответ]
Отправлено Петр З., православный, 15:25:50 25/07/2001
в ответ на:
Полно?, отправлено
Обскурант,
обскурантского, 20:00:33 23/07/2001
"Наткнулся" на Ваш ответ. Ирония подавляет. Насколько помню, не был Коперник архиепископом. Засумневался, поискал в Yahoo, вышел на католич. энциклопедию (адрес решил не давать). Там он-churchman, но не Bishop. Далее-цит: According to a popular notion the point, upon which beyond all others churchmen were determined to insist, was the geocentric system of astronomy. Nevertheless it was a churchman, Nicholas Copernicus, who first advanced the contrary doctrine that the sun and not the earth is the centre of our system, round which our planet revolves, rotating on its own axis. His great work, «De Revolutionibus orblure coelestium», was published at the earnest solicitation of two distinguished churchmen, Cardinal Schömberg and Tiedemann Giese, Bishop of Culm. It was dedicated by permission to Pope Paul III in order, as Copernicus explained, that it might be thus protected from the attacks which it was sure to encounter on the part of the «mathematicians» (i.e. philosophers) for its apparent contradiction of the evidence of our senses, and even of common sense. He added that he made no account of objections which might be brought by ignorant wiseacres on Scriptural grounds. -Потом: диак. Андрей Кураев разбирал достаточно подробно (опять же, насколько помню) про Коперника, Галилея,гелиоцентризм. Мир антропоцентричен (спасение человека); ИМХО а физика- физикой, астрономия — иллюстрация(как всегда, «сквозь мутное стекло») Премудрости Божией.
Ответы и комментарии: